"Flat" isn't really flat? How???? Why????
Remember we started out without any restrictions on theta -- it was just the
ordinary polar angle varying from 0 to 2 Pi.
But the final coordinate transformation forced us to use the new angular
coordinate thp = (1 - 4 G M) theta. Therefore, the new angular coordinate thp
varies from 0 to 2 Pi (1 - 4 G M) . This means that a closed path around the
origin with radius R has a circumference of 2 Pi (1 - 4 G M) R instead of the
expected 2 Pi R. This is how curvature behaves! This is not how a flat spacetime
behaves!
The way to resolve this apparent paradox is to say that this spacetime is
"locally flat" but has curvature concentrated at the point in space
(or the line in spacetime) where the mass is located. Circular paths that don't
enclose the mass M have the normal flat relationship between radius and
circumference, but any closed path around the mass M shows the influence of the
curvature concentrated there. The point where this curvature is concentrated is
called a "conical singularity".
Isn't that a clever way to have our flat spacetime and curve it, too?
Up to But isn't this spacetime is really flat?
|